Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| CWC pondérée ajustée par la proximité× | Analyse des rapports d'évaluation pondérée par étapes× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2006 | 2010 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Rinner, C.; Heppleston, A. | Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Type≠ | Spatially heterogeneous additive utility — criterion weights vary per alternative as a function of proximity to a reference location | Sequential step-ratio subjective weighting |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Rinner, C., Heppleston, A. (2006). The spatial dimensions of multi-criteria evaluation — case study of a home buyer's spatial decision support system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (GIScience 2006) DOI ↗ | Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | PROXIMITY-WLC (Proximity-Adjusted WLC — spatially explicit weighted linear combination) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rinner, C.; Heppleston, A. in 2006. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|