Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| CWC pondérée ajustée par la proximité× | Méthode Meilleur-Pire× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2006 | 2015 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Rinner, C.; Heppleston, A. | Rezaei, J. |
| Type≠ | Spatially heterogeneous additive utility — criterion weights vary per alternative as a function of proximity to a reference location | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Rinner, C., Heppleston, A. (2006). The spatial dimensions of multi-criteria evaluation — case study of a home buyer's spatial decision support system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (GIScience 2006) DOI ↗ | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | PROXIMITY-WLC (Proximity-Adjusted WLC — spatially explicit weighted linear combination) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rinner, C.; Heppleston, A. in 2006. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|