ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)×Appariement par score de propension×
DomaineInférence causaleStatistiques de recherche
FamilleRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)1983
Auteur d'origineRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypeCausal inference / reweightingMethod
Source fondatriceRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
AliasPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weightingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Apparentées63
RésuméPropensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Matching. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare