Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| PROMETHEE VI× | PROMETHEE I× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1995 | 1986 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. |
| Type≠ | Sensitivity analysis of PROMETHEE rankings across all feasible weight combinations | Outranking via positive/negative flows (partial preorder) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B. (1995). The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems DOI ↗ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées≠ | 2 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | PROMETHEE-VI (PROMETHEE VI — Walking Weights Sensitivity) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|