ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

PROMETHEE III×Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine19861995
Auteur d'origineBrans, J. P. Vincke, P. Mareschal, B.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeOutranking via interval flows derived from net-flow mean and dispersionStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Source fondatriceBrans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméPROMETHEE-III (PROMETHEE III — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations III (interval ranking)) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Vincke, P. Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: PROMETHEE-III · CRITIC. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare