Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| PROMETHEE III× | Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1986 | 1980 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Brans, J. P. Vincke, P. Mareschal, B. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Outranking via interval flows derived from net-flow mean and dispersion | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | PROMETHEE-III (PROMETHEE III — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations III (interval ranking)) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Vincke, P. Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|