ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de co-citation conforme à PRISMA×Analyse de co-citation×
DomaineScientométrieBibliométrie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s)1973
Auteur d'originePRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973)Henry Small
TypeSystematic bibliometric reviewMethod
Source fondatricePage, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Aliassystematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Apparentées65
RésuméPRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: PRISMA-compliant Co-citation analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare