Comparer des méthodes

	Analyse de co-citation conforme à PRISMA	Analyse par couplage bibliographique
Domaine	Scientométrie	Bibliométrie
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s)	1963
Auteur d'origine	PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973)	Melvin M. Kessler
Type	Systematic bibliometric review	Method
Source fondatrice	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.	Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131.
Alias	systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis	document coupling, bibliographic similarity
Apparentées	6	5
Résumé	PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram.	Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.