ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Conception pragmatique de la méthodologie mixte×Conception transformative par méthodes mixtes×
DomaineConception de la rechercheConception de la recherche
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origineEarly 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century2003–2009
Auteur d'origineJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard RortyDonna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
TypeMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Source fondatriceCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Aliaspragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methodstransformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
Apparentées66
RésuméPragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design · Transformative Mixed Methods Design. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare