Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Étude cas-témoins pragmatique× | Étude de cohorte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Épidémiologie | Épidémiologie |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1950s–1960s (classical); pragmatic framing 1967–2000s | Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Evolved from classical case-control methodology (Dorn, 1954; Cornfield, 1956); pragmatic framing formalized by Schwartz & Lellouch (1967) | Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854) |
| Type≠ | Observational epidemiological study design | Observational longitudinal study design |
| Source fondatrice | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 |
| Alias | real-world case-control study, pragmatic case-control design, effectiveness case-control study, PCCS | longitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study |
| Apparentées | 6 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | A pragmatic case-control study is an observational design that compares individuals who have developed a disease or outcome (cases) with those who have not (controls), using data collected under routine real-world conditions rather than strictly controlled experimental settings. Exposure histories are reconstructed from clinical records, registries, or administrative databases. The design is chosen when a conventional explanatory case-control study would be impractical, unethical, or too narrow to inform actual clinical or public-health decisions. | A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|