Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse postcoloniale× | Analyse du discours× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Qualitatif | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | Late 20th century (Said 1978; Spivak 1988; Bhabha 1994) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Edward Said, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Homi K. Bhabha | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books. ISBN: 978-0394428147 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | postcolonial criticism, postcolonial theory, colonial discourse analysis, decolonial analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Résumé≠ | Postcolonial analysis is a qualitative research approach that critically examines the lasting cultural, political, epistemic, and social effects of colonialism and imperialism. Drawing on foundational works by Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, and Homi Bhabha, it interrogates how colonial power relations are reproduced in texts, institutions, identities, and knowledge systems — and how colonised or marginalised voices can be recovered, amplified, and centred. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|