Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| MABAC Plithogénique (avec pondération BWM et incertitude des nombres flous)× | Méthode Meilleur-Pire× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine | 2015 | 2015 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Pamučar, D. Ćirović, G. | Rezaei, J. |
| Type≠ | Plithogenic-rough border approximation area (PL+RN+MABAC) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using MABAC. Expert Systems with Applications link ↗ | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées≠ | 3 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | PL-MABAC (Plithogenic MABAC (with BWM weighting and Rough Number uncertainty)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D. Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|