ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation de l'importance des critères relatifs par paires de pivot×Solution de compromis combinée×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20172019
Auteur d'origineStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypePivot pairwise sequential ratio weightingAggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
Source fondatriceStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméPIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: PIPRECIA · COCOSO. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare