ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation de l'importance des critères relatifs par paires de pivot×COmprehensive distance Based RAnking×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20172022
Auteur d'origineStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M.Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P.
TypePivot pairwise sequential ratio weightingDistance from PIS/NIS/AS (Euclidean × Taxicab combined)
Source fondatriceStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. (2022). A Novel Axiomatic DEA-COBRA Framework for Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Agri-Food Systems. Sustainability link ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméPIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COBRA (COmprehensive distance Based RAnking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G. P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P. P. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: PIPRECIA · COBRA. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare