Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Essai pilote randomisé contrôlé× | Essai contrôlé randomisé en grappes× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Plans d'expériences | Plans d'expériences |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1990s–2000s (methodological formalization) | 1978–1980s |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Formalized through clinical trials methodology community | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| Type≠ | Experimental feasibility design | Experimental design |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., ... & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 1. DOI ↗ | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| Alias | pilot RCT, feasibility RCT, pilot trial, preliminary RCT | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | A pilot randomized controlled trial (pilot RCT) is a small-scale, fully randomized experiment conducted before a definitive RCT to test the feasibility of study procedures, estimate key parameters such as recruitment rates and effect-size variability, and identify practical barriers. It uses the same randomization, intervention, and measurement protocol as the planned full trial but on a fraction of the target sample. The goal is not to confirm efficacy but to refine and justify the main trial design. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|