Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Extension hésitante probabiliste de COPRAS× | Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | ANP× | Méthode Meilleur-Pire× | Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision | Prise de décision | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2021 | 1980 | 1996 | 2015 | 1995 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C. | Saaty, T. L. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Type≠ | Probabilistic Hesitant ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Song, H. F., Chen, Z. C. (2021). Multi-attribute decision-making method based distance and COPRAS method with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — | — | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | PHF-COPRAS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|