ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération par ACP×Technique de classement par intervalles standardisés adaptatifs×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine19012024
Auteur d'originePearson, K.Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D.
TypeWeight_Objective (PCA variance explained, eigenvector-based)Two-level standardization + ideal/anti-ideal utility (β-anchored)
Source fondatricePearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine DOI ↗Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. (2024). A picture fuzzy CIMAS-ARTASI model for website performance analysis in human resource management. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméPCA-WEIGHT (PCA Weighting — Principal Component Analysis based objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pearson, K. in 1901. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARTASI (Alternative Ranking Technique based on Adaptive Standardized Intervals) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: PCA-WEIGHT · ARTASI. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare