Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Paired Comparison Method× | Free Listing× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine | 1988 | 1988 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Cognitive anthropology tradition (Weller & Romney) | Cognitive anthropology tradition (formalized by Weller & Romney; Borgatti) |
| Type≠ | Elicitation procedure for scaling or ranking items by a single criterion | Elicitation procedure for the items and salience of a cultural domain |
| Source fondatrice | Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection. Qualitative Research Methods Series 10. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780803930742 | Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection. Qualitative Research Methods Series 10. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. ISBN: 9780803930742 |
| Alias | Method of Paired Comparisons, Pairwise Comparison Task, Pair-Comparison Ranking, Pairwise Judgment Elicitation | Free Lists, Free-List Task, Free Recall Listing, Freelisting |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The paired comparison method is a systematic elicitation technique in which informants are shown every possible pair of items from a set and asked, for each pair, which member better fits a single criterion — which is sweeter, more dangerous, more prestigious, or more similar to a reference. Because every item is judged against every other item, the procedure forces fine, transitive discriminations that a one-shot ranking would blur. Aggregating the pairwise verdicts across informants yields a dominance or proximity matrix from which a stable rank order or an interval scale can be recovered. | Free listing is a foundational elicitation technique in cognitive anthropology in which informants are asked to name, in any order, all the items they can think of that belong to a cultural domain — for example 'all the kinds of fruit' or 'all the things that can give you a cold.' Aggregating these lists reveals both the content of the domain (which items belong) and the salience of each item (how culturally central it is), inferred from how frequently and how early it is mentioned. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|