Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Extension plithogénique de P-COPRAS× | Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2018 | 1995 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Smarandache, F. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Type≠ | Plithogenic outranking/ranking — Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Smarandache, F. (2018). Plithogeny, Plithogenic Set, Logic, Probability, and Statistics. Pons Publishing, Brussels link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | P-COPRAS (Plithogenic extension of P-COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Smarandache, F. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|