Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Extension plithogénique de P-CODAS× | Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2018 | 2010 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Smarandache, F. | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. |
| Type≠ | Plithogenic outranking/ranking — Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) | Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Smarandache, F. (2018). Plithogeny, Plithogenic Set, Logic, Probability, and Statistics. Pons Publishing, Brussels link ↗ | Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | P-CODAS (Plithogenic extension of P-CODAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Smarandache, F. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|