ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Moyenne Pondérée Ordonnée×Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine1988; GIS extension 19971995
Auteur d'origineYager, R. R.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeParameterised additive aggregation with reordered criterion weights (AND ↔ WLC ↔ OR continuum)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Source fondatriceYager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméOWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yager, R. R. in 1988; GIS extension 1997. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: OWA · CRITIC. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare