Comparer des méthodes

	Article de recherche original	Processus de révision par les pairs
Domaine	Rédaction académique	Éthique de la publication
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1665	1665
Auteur d'origine	Scientific research community	Scientific publishing community; formalized by journals and COPE
Type	Document Type	Process
Source fondatrice	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE.	Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines: Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. COPE.
Alias	research paper, empirical article, primary research, journal article	Peer Reviewing, Manuscript Evaluation, Scholarly Review
Apparentées	5	4
Résumé	An original research article is the primary vehicle for reporting new empirical findings in a discipline. Following the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), it represents a researcher's novel data, analysis, and interpretation. The journal article format has been the gold standard for scientific communication since the establishment of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665.	Peer review is the process by which manuscripts are evaluated by experts in the same field before publication in academic journals. Reviewers assess the manuscript's scientific merit, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field. Established in 1665 with the first scientific journal (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), peer review remains the gold standard for quality control in academic publishing. Despite ongoing criticism and proposals for alternatives, peer review continues to filter low-quality and unethical work, though it is imperfect and sometimes slow.