Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Validité nomologique ordinale× | Validité nomologique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present | 1955 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometrics | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Type≠ | Validity assessment | Validity evidence framework |
| Source fondatrice | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | nomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validity | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Ordinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|