ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Échantillonnage pondéré en ligne×Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)×
DomaineMéthodologie d'enquêteInférence causale
FamilleProcess / pipelineRegression model
Année d'origineLate 1990s–2000s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Auteur d'origineSurvey methodology practitioners; systematized via probability-based online panels (e.g., Knowledge Networks, founded late 1990s)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeProbability-adjusted online sampling techniqueCausal inference / reweighting
Source fondatriceDillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118456149Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasweb-based weighted sampling, internet survey weighting, online panel weighting, weighted internet samplingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Apparentées46
RésuméOnline weighted sampling is the practice of recruiting respondents via internet platforms and then applying statistical weights to correct for unequal selection probabilities, coverage gaps, and differential non-response. It enables researchers to draw valid population inferences from web surveys by compensating for the structural biases inherent in online recruitment — including the fact that not all members of a target population have equal internet access or equal likelihood of joining a panel.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Online Weighted Sampling · Propensity Score Weighting. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare