Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Classement de la Compétitivité Opérationnelle× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1994 | 1996 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Parkan, C. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Preference rating (input/output separation) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Parkan, C. (1994). Operational competitiveness ratings of production units. Managerial and Decision Economics DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | OCRA (Operational Competitiveness Rating) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Parkan, C. in 1994. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|