Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| NVivo et ATLAS.ti pour l'analyse qualitative× | Observation participante× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Recherche qualitative | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1999 | 1922 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | QSR International (NVivo) and Scientific Software-Citational (ATLAS.ti) | Bronislaw Malinowski |
| Type≠ | Tool | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412903653 | Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432 |
| Alias≠ | CAQDAS, QDA software, qualitative analysis software, NVivo | ethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | NVivo and ATLAS.ti are Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) programs that facilitate coding, organizing, and analyzing qualitative data—including text (transcripts, documents), images, video, and audio. NVivo, developed by QSR International, is widely used in academic research and supports data organization, coding, memo-writing, retrieval, and analysis visualizations. ATLAS.ti, developed by Scientific Software-Citational, emphasizes hermeneutic interpretation and network visualization. Both tools were introduced in the late 1990s and have become standard across disciplines. CAQDAS is not analysis itself—the researcher must make analytical decisions—but rather augments human analysis by managing large data volumes, organizing codes systematically, tracking analysis decisions, and generating visualizations. These tools improve transparency and rigor in qualitative research. | Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|