Comparer des méthodes

	Analyse de la résilience et de la vulnérabilité des réseaux	Détection de communautés	Réseau neuronal à graphes
Domaine	Analyse de réseaux	Analyse de réseaux	Analyse de réseaux
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2000	2002–2019 (algorithm family)	2017–2018 (major variants)
Auteur d'origine	Albert, Jeong & Barabási	Louvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)	—
Type	Network robustness / vulnerability framework	Graph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family	Deep learning on graph-structured data
Source fondatrice	Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabási, A.L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378–382.	Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008.	Kipf, T.N. & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
Alias	network vulnerability analysis, attack tolerance analysis, Ağ Dayanıklılığı ve Güvenlik Açığı Analizi	graph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)	GNN, GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE
Apparentées	5	5	5
Résumé	Network resilience and vulnerability analysis is an analytical framework, formalised by Albert, Jeong, and Barabási (2000), that measures how a network degrades functionally as nodes or edges are progressively removed. By running targeted-attack simulations — removing the highest-centrality nodes first — and random-failure simulations — removing nodes at uniform probability — the framework identifies which structural elements are critical to network integrity and where infrastructure is most exposed.	Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?	A Graph Neural Network (GNN) is a deep learning architecture that operates directly on graph-structured data by combining node features with structural information through iterative neighborhood message passing. The three canonical variants — the Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) introduced by Kipf and Welling in 2017, the Graph Attention Network (GAT) introduced by Veličković et al. in 2018, and GraphSAGE — differ in how they aggregate neighbor information: GCN applies a spectral convolution over the full adjacency, GAT weights neighbors by learned attention scores, and GraphSAGE samples and aggregates local neighborhoods inductively, enabling generalization to unseen nodes.