ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

L'analyse enveloppante de données de réseau (Network DEA)×Bootstrap DEA×Indice de productivité de Malmquist×
DomaineAnalyse d'efficienceAnalyse d'efficienceAnalyse d'efficience
FamilleRegression modelRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine200019981994
Auteur d'origineFäre & GrosskopfSimar & WilsonFäre, Grosskopf, Norris & Zhang
TypeMulti-stage nonparametric efficiency modelNonparametric efficiency estimation with bootstrap inferenceNon-parametric productivity index
Source fondatriceFäre, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49. DOI ↗Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. DOI ↗Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83. link ↗
AliasNetwork Data Envelopment Analysis, Network Efficiency Analysis, Multi-Stage DEA, Ağ Veri Zarflama AnaliziBootstrapped DEA, DEA Bootstrap Inference, Simar-Wilson Bootstrap, Bootstrap Sınır AnaliziMPI, Malmquist Index, Malmquist DEA Productivity Index, Malmquist Verimlilik Endeksi
Apparentées221
RésuméNetwork Data Envelopment Analysis (Network DEA) is a nonparametric efficiency measurement framework introduced by Färe and Grosskopf (2000) that extends classical DEA to multi-stage or multi-division production processes. Rather than treating a decision-making unit as a black box, it explicitly models the internal structure — the divisions and the intermediate products that flow between them — enabling stage-level and overall efficiency scores to be estimated simultaneously within a single coherent model.Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis (Bootstrap DEA) is a resampling-based extension of standard DEA that provides statistically valid inference for efficiency scores. Introduced by Simar and Wilson in 1998, it addresses the core weakness of classical DEA — its inability to quantify uncertainty in estimated scores — by constructing bootstrap confidence intervals and bias-corrected efficiency estimates from repeatedly resampled pseudo-frontiers.The Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) is a non-parametric measure of total factor productivity (TFP) change over time. Formally grounded in distance functions by Caves, Christensen, and Diewert (1982) and operationalized using Data Envelopment Analysis by Färe, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang (1994), MPI decomposes productivity growth into two components: efficiency change (catching-up to the frontier) and technical change (shift of the frontier itself).
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Network DEA · Bootstrap DEA · Malmquist Productivity Index. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare