ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse scientométrique basée sur les réseaux×Analyse par co-occurrence de mots×
DomaineScientométrieScientométrie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s1983
Auteur d'origineDerek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping)Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleagues
TypeQuantitative bibliometric methodScientometric network analysis technique
Source fondatricevan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗
Aliasscientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mappingkeyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWA
Apparentées66
RésuméNetwork-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used.Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Network-based Scientometric analysis · Co-word Analysis. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare