ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de co-citation basée sur les réseaux×Analyse de co-citation×
DomaineScientométrieBibliométrie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1973 (co-citation); network-analytic extension widely adopted 2000s–2010s1973
Auteur d'origineHenry Small (co-citation foundation); network visualization extended by Chaomei Chen and othersHenry Small
TypeBibliometric network analysisMethod
Source fondatriceSmall, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Aliasco-citation network analysis, bibliometric network co-citation, co-citation mapping, CCA network approachco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Apparentées65
RésuméNetwork-based co-citation analysis is a bibliometric technique that measures how often pairs of documents are cited together by later works, then models those relationships as a weighted network. Nodes represent documents (or authors or journals), edges represent co-citation frequency, and network algorithms identify clusters of intellectually related literature. It is widely used in systematic and scoping reviews to map the intellectual structure of a research field.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Network-based Co-citation Analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare