ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Network Autocorrelation Model×MRQAP Network Regression×
DomaineSociologySociology
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine1980 (spatial/network models); 2002 (weight matrix)1988 (MRQAP); 2007 (double-semipartialing test)
Auteur d'originePatrick Doreian; Roger Leenders (weight-matrix synthesis)David Krackhardt; David Dekker, David Krackhardt & Tom Snijders
TypeRegression with an autoregressive term on a network weight matrixPermutation-based multiple regression for dyadic (matrix) outcomes
Source fondatriceLeenders, R. Th. A. J. (2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks, 24(1), 21–47. DOI ↗Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359–381. DOI ↗
Aliasnetwork effects model, social influence model, network disturbances model, autoregressive network modelMRQAP, multiple regression QAP, Dekker double-semipartialing, QAP regression
Apparentées44
RésuméThe network autocorrelation model adapts spatial-econometric regression to social networks to estimate peer influence: it explains an actor's outcome — an attitude, behavior, or performance — as a function of their own covariates plus a weighted average of their network partners' outcomes. The autocorrelation parameter ρ captures the strength of social influence, and the network weight matrix W encodes who influences whom and how strongly.Multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MRQAP) extends QAP to the regression setting: it predicts a dependent relational matrix from several independent relational matrices on the same actors — for example, modeling who collaborates with whom as a function of who is co-located, who shares a department, and who has prior friendship. Coefficients are estimated by ordinary least squares on the vectorized matrices, but significance is assessed by permutation, because dyadic dependence invalidates the standard regression standard errors.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Network Autocorrelation Model · MRQAP Network Regression. Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare