Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Approche novatrice pour l'évaluation et les environnements de décision imprécis× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1995 | 1996 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Munda, G. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Fuzzy pairwise equity/inequality comparison (semantic distance) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Munda, G. (1995). Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | NAIADE (Novel Approach to Imprecise Assessment and Decision Environments) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Munda, G. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|