Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Extension neutrosophique de MOORA× | Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2018 | 1980 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Gamal, A., Ismail, M., Smarandache, F. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | (). N-MOORA — INTERNAL EXTENSION (no SVN-MOORA seminal in literature). link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | N-MOORA (Neutrosophic extension of MOORA) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Gamal, A., Ismail, M., Smarandache, F. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|