Comparer des méthodes

	Extension neutrosophique de EDAS	Processus d'analyse hiérarchique	BWM bayésien
Domaine	Prise de décision	Prise de décision	Prise de décision
Famille	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Année d'origine	2021	1980	2020
Auteur d'origine	Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F.	Saaty, T. L.	Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J.
Type	Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Hierarchical Dirichlet posterior over weights via MCMC (JAGS) — group decision
Source fondatrice	Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. (2021). A single-valued neutrosophic extension of the EDAS method. Axioms	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega
Alias	—	—	—
Apparentées	8	8	8
Résumé	N-EDAS (Neutrosophic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Smarandache, F. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM-BAYESIAN (Bayesian BWM — Probabilistic Group Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.