ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Extension neutrosophique de AROMAN×Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20232010
Auteur d'origineBošković et al.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypeNeutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Source fondatriceBošković et al. (2023). Neutrosophic Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization. IEEE Access link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméN-AROMAN (Neutrosophic extension of AROMAN) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković et al. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: N-AROMAN · CCSD. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare