Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Validité discriminante multiniveaux× | Validité discriminante× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychométrie | Psychométrie |
| Famille | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2005 | 1959 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Dyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & West | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Type≠ | Validity evaluation within multilevel CFA | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | multilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Multilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|