Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Entretien approfondi multi-sources× | Groupe de discussion multi-sources× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Méthodologie d'enquête | Méthodologie d'enquête |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature) | 1980s–1990s |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Grounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and others | Developed from focus group methodology; formalized in applied social research (Krueger, Morgan, and colleagues) |
| Type | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection technique |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244 |
| Alias | multi-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interview | multi-stakeholder focus group, multiple-source focus group, cross-source focus group, MSFG |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study. | The multi-source focus group method extends the standard focus group design by deliberately recruiting participants from two or more distinct stakeholder groups — for example, clinicians and patients, teachers and students, or managers and frontline staff. Separate sessions are held for each source group using a shared discussion protocol, and the resulting data are analyzed both within each group and across groups to reveal convergences, tensions, and perspectives that no single-source design could uncover. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|