Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Entretien approfondi multi-sources× | Entretien approfondi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Méthodologie d'enquête | Qualitatif |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature) | Mid-20th century (formalised in qualitative social research from the 1950s onward) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Grounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and others | Rooted in sociological interviewing traditions; systematised by researchers including Steinar Kvale and Herbert J. Rubin |
| Type≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative research method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203 |
| Alias | multi-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interview | IDI, semi-structured interview, unstructured interview, qualitative interview |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | The multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study. | The in-depth interview is a one-to-one qualitative data-collection method in which a researcher engages a participant in an extended, open-ended conversation to elicit rich, detailed accounts of experiences, perceptions, beliefs, or meanings. Unlike structured surveys, the interview guide serves as a flexible road map rather than a fixed script, allowing the researcher to probe unexpected directions as they emerge. The approach is foundational to qualitative inquiry and is used directly as a primary method or as the data-collection arm of phenomenology, grounded theory, narrative analysis, and other frameworks. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|