ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

MSFC : Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite×Indice de Mobilité Rivermead (IMR)×
DomaineNeurologieNeurologie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19991991
Auteur d'origineGary Cutter, Richard Rudick, and NMSS ConsortiumFrank Collen, Derick Wade, and Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre
TypeClinician-administered performance testClinician-observed performance test
Source fondatriceCutter, G. R., Baier, M. L., Rudick, R. A., et al. (1999). Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Multiple Sclerosis, 5(4), 244-250. DOI ↗Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., Bradshaw, C. M. (1991). The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies, 13(2), 50-54. DOI ↗
AliasMS Functional CompositeRivermead Mobility Index
Apparentées45
RésuméThe Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is an objective, performance-based assessment of MS-related disability capturing three key functional domains: lower extremity mobility, upper extremity coordination, and cognitive/processing speed. Developed in 1999 by the National MS Society and adopted widely in clinical trials, the MSFC provides quantifiable endpoints complementing the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The three-component design addresses EDSS limitations by including cognition and standardizing measurement via timed tasks.The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is a brief, clinician-observed performance test of basic mobility abilities developed for assessing stroke and neurological rehabilitation outcomes. Published in 1991 by Frank Collen and colleagues at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre (Oxford, UK), the 15-item index measures bed mobility, sitting/standing balance, transfers, and ambulation. The RMI is widely used in stroke units and rehabilitation settings to track functional recovery and predict discharge outcomes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: MSFC · RMI. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare