Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Moral Foundations Questionnaire× | Échelle d'idéologie politique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychologie politique | Psychologie politique |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2011 | 1990 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al. | Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Norberto Bobbio |
| Type≠ | Self-report values inventory | Self-report |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. DOI ↗ | Fuchs, D., & Klingemann, H. D. (1990). The left-right schema. In M. Kent Jennings & Jan W. Van Deth (Eds.), Continuities in political action. Berlin: De Gruyter. link ↗ |
| Alias | MFQ, MFQ-30, Moral Foundations Theory Questionnaire | Left-Right Scale, Ideology Continuum, Political Spectrum Scale |
| Apparentées≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 30-item self-report instrument developed by Graham, Haidt and colleagues (2011) to measure the degree to which people rely on five intuitive moral foundations: Care/harm, Fairness/cheating, Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Sanctity/degradation. It is the standard operationalization of Moral Foundations Theory, which argues that political and cultural moral disagreements arise from differing weights placed on these foundations. | The Political Ideology Scale measures individual self-placement on a left-right political spectrum, capturing fundamental preferences for government role, economic organization, and social values. The single-item self-placement measure (most common) asks respondents to rate themselves on a 0-10 or 0-100 continuum; multi-item versions assess distinct ideological dimensions (economic policy, social policy, nationalism). The left-right axis remains the dominant organizing principle of political competition globally, predicting party choice, policy preferences, and electoral behavior despite critiques that it oversimplifies multidimensional political space. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|