ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Recherche de test de modèle×Recherche par test d'hypothèse×
DomaineConception de la rechercheConception de la recherche
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990sEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)
Auteur d'origineKarl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling traditionKarl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson
TypeConfirmatory quantitative research designQuantitative confirmatory research design
Source fondatriceKline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603
Aliasmodel-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTRhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design
Apparentées54
RésuméModel testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence.Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Model Testing Research · Hypothesis Testing Research. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare