ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

F1-score moyenné par micro-classe×F1 moyen macro×
DomaineÉvaluation de modèlesÉvaluation de modèles
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine2000s2000s
Auteur d'origineMulti-class evaluation communityMulti-class evaluation community
TypeEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
Source fondatricePowers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗
AliasMicro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1Macro F1, Unweighted average F1
Apparentées43
RésuméMicro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance.Macro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score independently for each class and then takes the unweighted arithmetic mean. It treats all classes equally, regardless of their frequency in the dataset, making it useful for imbalanced multi-class problems.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Micro-averaged F1 · Macro-averaged F1. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare