Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Méthodes de jumelage (CEM / Optimal / Génétique)× | Effet Traitement Moyen Local (ETML / CACE)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Inférence causale | Inférence causale |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2012 | 1994 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching) | Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996) |
| Type≠ | Matching for causal inference | Instrumental-variable causal estimand |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | coarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM | LATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE) |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching. | The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|