Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Estimateur par appariement× | Pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité de traitement (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Inférence causale | Inférence causale |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1973 | 2000 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Rubin (1973); large-sample theory by Abadie & Imbens (2006) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Type≠ | Nonparametric matching / causal inference | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | nearest-neighbor matching, NNM, matching on covariates, covariate matching | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The matching estimator identifies the causal effect of a treatment by pairing each treated unit with one or more untreated units that have similar observed characteristics. Formalised by Rubin (1973) and given rigorous large-sample theory by Abadie and Imbens (2006), it constructs a credible control group from observational data without requiring a parametric model for the outcome. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|