ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation de tests de dépistage appariés×Étude cas-témoins appariée×
DomaineÉpidémiologieÉpidémiologie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1980s–2000s (formalized alongside diagnostic accuracy methodology)1950s–1970s
Auteur d'origineMethodological synthesis from matched case-control and diagnostic accuracy traditions (Pepe, Zhou, and others)Brian MacMahon and others; systematised by Schlesselman (1982)
TypeObservational diagnostic study with matched designObservational analytic design
Source fondatricePepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755474
Aliasmatched diagnostic accuracy study, paired screening evaluation, matched-pair test performance study, matched screening assessmentmatched case-referent study, individually matched case-control, pair-matched case-control, matched case-control design
Apparentées65
RésuméMatched screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a screening or diagnostic test using a matched design, in which disease-positive cases are paired with one or more disease-free controls selected to share key characteristics such as age, sex, or clinical setting. Matching controls for confounders before measuring test performance produces more precise and less biased estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and enables direct paired comparisons of competing tests within the same subjects.A matched case-control study is an observational epidemiological design in which each case (a person with the disease or outcome of interest) is paired with one or more controls (persons without the outcome) who share one or more characteristics — such as age, sex, or clinical setting — to control confounding. Exposure history is then compared between cases and their matched controls to estimate the odds ratio of the exposure-disease association.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Matched Screening Test Evaluation · Matched case-control study. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare