ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Étude appariée d'exactitude diagnostique×Étude épidémiologique transversale×
DomaineÉpidémiologieÉpidémiologie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1990s–2000s (formalised with STARD 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
Auteur d'origineEvolved from matched case-control methodology; STARD standards formalised by Bossuyt et al. (2003)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
TypeDiagnostic / clinical epidemiology study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
Source fondatriceBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ, 326(7379), 41–44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Aliasmatched DAS, paired diagnostic accuracy study, matched test accuracy study, matched sensitivity-specificity studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Apparentées46
RésuméA matched diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test correctly identifies a target condition in study participants who have been matched on key characteristics — such as age, sex, or disease severity — to control for confounding. By pairing diseased and non-diseased subjects on relevant factors before administering the test, the design isolates the test's own discriminative performance from variation attributable to imbalanced covariates, yielding cleaner estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related accuracy measures.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Matched Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare