ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Comparaison par aire de bordure multi-attributive×Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20151995
Auteur d'originePamučar, D., Ćirović, G.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeBorder approximation area (distance from BAA)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Source fondatricePamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméMABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: MABAC · CRITIC. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare