ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération Objective pilotée par les Variations Logarithmiques en Pourcentage×Évaluation du rapport additif×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20222010
Auteur d'origineEcer, F., Pamučar, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeLogarithmic percentage change variance-based objective weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Source fondatriceEcer, F., Pamučar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI integrated sustainability performance evaluation methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméLOPCOW (LOgarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ecer, F., Pamučar, D. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: LOPCOW · ARAS. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare