ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Extension linguistique de L2T-SAW×Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20181995
Auteur d'origineCid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeLinguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α))Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Source fondatriceCid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Prioritization of the launch of ICT products and services through linguistic multi-criteria decision-making (2-tuple SAW). Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméL2T-SAW (Linguistic extension of L2T-SAW) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: L2T-SAW · CRITIC. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare