ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

EDAS Linguistique Neutrosophique 2-Tuples×Corrélation des critères et écart-type pour la pondération objective×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20192010
Auteur d'origineWang, P., Wang, J., Wei, G.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypeLinguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α))Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Source fondatriceKeshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451. [Canonical EDAS source; cited in place of the retracted Wang et al. (2019) 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic EDAS paper, doi:10.3233/JIFS-179223.] DOI ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméL2T-EDAS (2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, P., Wang, J., Wei, G. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: L2T-EDAS · CCSD. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare